{"id":713,"date":"2026-06-01T05:48:38","date_gmt":"2026-06-01T05:48:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/planetary-gearboxes.com\/?p=713"},"modified":"2026-06-01T05:48:38","modified_gmt":"2026-06-01T05:48:38","slug":"planetary-gearbox-radial-axial-load-capacity-calculation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/planetary-gearboxes.com\/it\/planetary-gearbox-radial-axial-load-capacity-calculation\/","title":{"rendered":"Capacit\u00e0 di carico radiale e assiale del riduttore epicicloidale - Guida al calcolo"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/p>\n Correctly specifying planetary gearbox radial load capacity prevents the most common cause of premature planetary gearbox output bearing failure in Korean industry is not under-rated torque \u2014 it is under-rated radial load<\/strong>. A sprocket, pulley, or pinion mounted on the output shaft imposes a radial force that must be supported by the output bearing system. When this force is applied at a distance from the gearbox face, the bending moment on the output shaft multiplies the effective bearing load \u2014 and L10 bearing life drops with the cube of that load ratio.<\/p>\n View EP-AF High-Rigidity Series \u2192 <\/p>\n Every planetary gearbox output shaft carries three types of loading simultaneously: torque (the primary drive force), radial load (a force perpendicular to the shaft axis), and axial load (a force along the shaft axis). The torque capacity is what most engineers specify from the catalogue. The radial and axial loads are frequently underestimated or omitted \u2014 and their effect on bearing life is far more severe than the equivalent increase in torque.<\/p>\n A force perpendicular to the output shaft axis \u2014 the key planetary gearbox radial load source. Generated by:<\/p>\n A force along the output shaft axis. Generated by:<\/p>\n The L10 bearing life relationship is cubic: L10 \u221d (C\/P)\u00b3. Doubling the radial load P reduces bearing life to (1\/2)\u00b3 = one-eighth. The same doubling of coppia<\/em> typically increases bearing load by much less than doubling (because torque loads the gear teeth, not the output bearing directly). This asymmetry means radial load specification errors have a disproportionately severe impact on bearing life.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n <\/p>\n Korea Ever-Power catalogues specify the permissible radial load at a reference point \u2014 typically a distance x_ref<\/em> from the output flange face. When the actual radial load is applied at a different distance (either closer or further from the flange), the effective bearing load changes. The relationship is derived from the bending moment at the output bearing.<\/p>\n OVERHANG LOAD MULTIPLIER DERIVATION<\/p>\n F_bearing = F_r \u00d7 (x + a) \/ a<\/p>\n Dove: Catalogue permissible radial force F_r_perm is given at x = x_ref At actual installation distance x_actual: Simplified multiplier k = (x_ref + a) \/ (x_actual + a) Example: a = 40 mm, x_ref = 20 mm, x_actual = 60 mm
<\/p>\nPlanetary Gearbox Radial Load Capacity \u2014
\nL10 Bearing Life and Shaft Selection<\/h1>\n
\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\nRadial vs Axial Load \u2014 Sources and Why Both Must Be Calculated<\/h2>\n
Radial load sources<\/h3>\n
\n
Axial load sources<\/h3>\n
\n
Why radial load matters more than torque for bearing life<\/h3>\n
The Overhang Multiplier \u2014 How Mounting Distance Amplifies Bearing Load<\/h2>\n
\nx = distance from gearbox flange face to load application point (mm)
\na = distance from gearbox flange face to output bearing centre (mm)
\n(internal dimension \u2014 from Korea Ever-Power datasheet)<\/p>\n
\n\u2192 F_bearing_ref = F_r_perm \u00d7 (x_ref + a) \/ a<\/p>\n
\nF_r_allowable = F_bearing_ref \u00d7 a \/ (x_actual + a)<\/p>\n
\nF_r_allowable = F_r_perm \u00d7 k<\/p>\n
\nk = (20 + 40) \/ (60 + 40) = 60\/100 = 0.60<\/span>
\n\u2192 Permissible radial force reduced by 40%<\/span> at 60mm overhang<\/div>\n<\/div>\n